Social imaginary of a literary technique: About dynamics of transitivity in Russian literature of the late 19th century (Dostoevsky, Garshin, Chekhov)

This article discusses the problems we face while describing transition periods. I analyze various approaches to phenomenon of and criteria used for their identification. suggest that should pay more attention internal substance process than role sociocultural factors or external features which reflect changes in literature. The are discussed using texts by Dostoevsky, Garshin Chekhov who represent many respects transitional epoch late 19th century. Chronologically, oeuvres belong adjacent periods, so it is possible trace as a but not set typological attributes. comparative analysis focused on motive response generalized literary technique, differences its use demonstrate transformations zones field — from author’s intention reader’s reception techniques creation narration. For all three Russian writers, search “new ways” strategic decisions connected with readers’ activity, although each them understands his own way. Dostoevsky believe literature recover social consensus, plays principal here. Chekhov, ceased be goal. In system, constant critical defamiliarization any point view gives way new type interaction. As result, such historical assessment prognosis fully expressed Chekhov’s system.